Main Content RSS FeedFeature Article

VMworld 2010: Hands-On Labs »

This morning John Troyer coordinated a bunch of bloggers for a session over at the VMworld 2010 Hands-On Lab facilities in Moscone West. Adam Zimman, Dan Anderson, and Curtis Pope took turns explaining and demoing the lab to us. The lab itself was built as a cloud-oriented system, using software-on-demand and service-on-demand principles, and relying heavily on remotely-hosted equipment in data centers in Miami, FL (Terremark) and Ashburn, VA (Verizon).

The Lab team is really building on what they’ve learned from other years. There are many more labs this year than last, and they’re all self-paced, though there are options for instructor interaction as well if you have questions or want more one-on-one guidance. Self-paced labs means they can do almost unlimited content, and it’s easier to get lots of people through the labs. Last year they had, all totalled, about 7000 lab seat hours. This year they have almost 20,000, with 480 View stations in eight rooms. Dan Anderson, the lab’s lead architect, had some proud things to say about what they’ve done. “The content is killer, the best content I’ve seen yet. If someone sits for four days, eight hours a day, they might be able to get through all of them. But nobody can complain about not having enough stick time,” said Dan.

Perhaps he’s never met some of the curmudgeonly people that attend VMworld. :) But I really appreciate the iterative approach they’ve taken this year to making the labs better. For instance, they learned that pre-registration for the labs didn’t work very well in other years, so it’s all first-come, first-served (FIFO). There’s a check-in station that works with your badge number, and a waiting room with couches and whiteboards and Subject Matter Experts while you wait. The labs will be open from 8 AM until 10 PM every day, too, and they will be offering a prize to “dedicated individuals” (they thought speed and quantity might be the factors, but it isn’t set in stone). They did say the prizes would be something like a pass to VMworld 2011, though, which is very cool.

The hardware and software powering the lab is pretty amazing, with a number of sponsors contributing staff, equipment, and software to make it run. Sometimes on very short notice, too. And in some cases this lab is the largest deployment yet of these technologies. They’re pre-populating lab environments with instances of each lab setup, to avoid the on-demand 5 to 7 minute wait from last year, which is great. They’re worried that they’ll have the prepopulation levels off a little on the first day, but even if you do get caught waiting you can still read the manuals. They estimate that the labs are using roughly 36 TB of RAM (yes, TB) and there’s about 200 TB of storage, between EMC and NetApp, in each data center powering the labs, all connected via NFS. The storage itself is everything from enterprise flash (EFD) to SATA, with the EFD often being used as FastCache to front-end the slower storage.

The stations themselves are Wyse thin clients, with dual monitors and even dual chairs, even though it’s geared for one-on-one learning. It’s all about flexibility and options, which extends to the content itself — the vSphere Sandbox lab is just a deployment of all of their products, for freeform messing around. The Lab team even has redundant wiring to the lab stations, just in case they need it (“We even have redundant chairs!” said Adam). They’re flexible, they’re ready, and they’re hoping that they can set records for the number of happy people in the labs this year. And if you’re not happy, there’s 150 staff floating around to help you out, as well as two lab captains per room.

I’m looking forward to it — labs have always been a highlight of VMworld for me, and these guys are making it even better. I know it’s a lot of work to build, in two months, what usually would be done in a year or two (and then, as Dan said, “throw it on a truck.”). On behalf of all of us, thank you Adam, Dan, and Curtis (and all the others that we didn’t meet). I hope all your hard work is a giant success!

Main Content RSS FeedRecent Articles

VMworld 2010: Saturday »

A quick walk past Moscone on Saturday yielded a real life “401: Not Authorized,” most likely because it’s “501: Not Implemented” yet. So we continued on down to AT&T Park to watch the Giants lose to the Diamondbacks, 11-3 (it was 6-1 after the first inning, Barry Zito was having a real bad night). At least we got Joe DiMaggio bobbleheads. Not much else to do, it looks like a bunch of folks led by the inimitable Veeam guys went to the Chieftain. My coworker Steve and I opted for an early turn-in, to hedge against the upcoming late ones. Below are some photos.

On tap for Sunday: a sneak preview of the Labs this morning, brunch with a bunch of the Communities guys, registration and speaker setup at 2 PM, and then nothing. The vmunderground.com WUPaaS is tonight, but I missed the invites, so I might try sneaking in. Otherwise I’m sure other things will be going on. I do need to work on my presentation a bit, and perhaps a trip over into the Sunset district for some excellent Vietnamese at Pho Phu Quoc is in order, followed by a walk down Irving to the beach and the N Judah home.

I hope you’re all traveling well. Stay safe, and remember that if you’ve got a question or are looking for something to do #vmworld is a good start on Twitter. You can also message me, @plankers.

links for 2010-08-28 »

  • Um, ever heard of the long tail? I know a person who just got their first DVD player… This is NOT the beginning of the end of DVDs.
  • Across the street from my building… Thought it was a pipe bomb… Bomb dog smelled an odor… It probably was a section of pipe, seeing as the building immediately adjacent is a coal power plant staffed by people who have the titles like pipefitter, steamfitter, electrician, etc. And I wouldn't be surprised if it had solvent on it, and that's what the dog smelled. The real question is how it got in the van, but I bet someone just put it in there by accident. The movie "Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels" has a great quote, applicable here: "Chill, Winston."
  • Guy Kawasaki's list of skills you really need to know out in the real world is a great one. He republished it, well worth the couple of minutes you'll spend reading it and nodding in agreement.
  • This is really cool. And it makes a lot of sense. Sailing faster than the wind is possible because, in a lot of cases, the wind isn't directly pushing the boat. The people calling these guys idiots should really not talk about things they don't understand.

Rebel Alliances »

Stephen Foskett has a great post today on The Enterprise IT Acquisition Game, wherein he talks about how it’s open season on data storage companies, with a lesser emphasis on networking:

So this is the game: Four full-line enterprise superpowers battling each other for datacenter dominance and coveting the extra profits of a few verticals. HP clearly believes they can chip away at EMC and Cisco in storage and networking; Dell and IBM have so far focused mainly on storage; and Oracle hasn’t made a move in either direction, instead challenging the other three in the core server and software space.

Right on, especially with the “coveting the extra profits” part. For years, Dell, IBM, and HP have been busy commoditizing the compute node side of things. They’ve been driving the prices down on CPU and RAM for so long that the margins aren’t there anymore. And now, with the onset of widespread virtualization, the volume is no longer there to make up for it. However, storage is still a high-margin endeavor, and probably the single most expensive thing in my data center; I have $400K in CPU & RAM connected to $2m in storage. It is not surprising that there is a huge bidding war for 3PAR, and an open season on data storage companies. It’s one of the best ways for big companies to continue bleeding IT budgets, at least until SSD capacities rise and prices fall, and it does to storage what virtualization is doing to servers.

The thing is, virtualization is all about driving costs down in IT, and I just don’t see these big consolidation efforts as an actual way to do that in the long term. EMC has been downright nasty with my organization because they thought we were locked in. Cisco has done the same, and Oracle is generally regarded a bunch of jerks. Why would anybody choose UCS, VBlocks, or an all-in-one option from Oracle knowing that you’re locking yourself in? Even if the pricing is competitive right now, it won’t be for the fourth or fifth year of support where they think they’ve got you trapped.

Stephen’s last paragraph speaks of rebel alliances:

Although I would love to see a rebel alliance rise (imagine Juniper, NetApp, and Symantec joining forces!) this is not a likely scenario.

Like Stephen, I would enjoy seeing a rebel alliance, but I doubt it is likely, for two reasons. One, companies like buying from a single source, because they can get support guarantees, the purchasing process is a lot easier. Second, consolidated efforts like UCS and Vblocks are about software as much as they are about hardware. The promise of a true single pane of glass is very appealing.

If you look at some of the rebels in the software world, like Automattic and Flickr, you’ll notice something: their openness. In both of these cases they allow customers to do whatever they want with their own data. Want to pick it up and leave? That’s fine by them. Contrary to the thinking behind the sales models of EMC and Cisco, though, those companies have great customer retention rates. Because the fundamental idea that their customers are free to choose colors everything they do, they spend their time looking to make customers happy, not lock them in. And as a result you get products people want to use, and not products that are just a little less evil than the other guy.

Seeing that a true rebel alliance is unlikely, I’d love to see Dell become the open, rebel alternative to companies like EMC, Cisco, and Oracle. Even going so far as to develop a “Dblock” based on open technology, sold in increments, delivered in 19″ racks, managed through a single pane of glass, and marketed as the antithesis to vendor lock in. A Dblock could have Dell servers in it, Equallogic/3PAR storage, and Xsigo interconnects (imagine an array full of SSD and quad-rate Infiniband connections), and be very compelling. Especially if their answer to a question like “Can I attach my NetApp to it?” was “the ports are on the top left.” I’d be happy to do business with a company like that.

It’d just need one little twist: a change in attitude.

links for 2010-08-25 »

  • I like Marc Farley's list of what 3PAR does well. I've known Marc for a few years now, and I hope Dell ends up with 3PAR, partly because that'll make it easy for me to buy their gear, partly because that'll be the third time Marc's employer gets bought out by them. :) Hehehe.
  • I officially propose we take away Microsoft's Borg status and give it to Google. They're evil, plain and simple.
  • "Sometimes data is wrong out of ignorance. Other times it's wrong because people make stuff up. I can understand the former, but why you would ever do the latter is beyond me." Money — NSF and other grants represent millions of dollars, and this guy just couldn't tolerate being wrong because it means someone might question him. Academics are no different than anybody else in seeking fame and fortune and power, they are just very rarely accountable to anybody. It's good that someone called this guy on it, because I'm sure Harvard was just going to try to bury it to preserve their own image.
  • The Sun appears to be influencing the radioactive decay of particles. Interesting, though I suspect it'll somehow be further proof that the Earth is 4000 years old and Creationists are correct.
  • This is easily the stupidest thing I've seen all week. Mandating biodiesel in something that shouldn't ever run is a great way to save the world, right? Idiot politicians. Shouldn't we be mandating biodiesel in things like cars, trucks, or trains?

links for 2010-08-14 »

  • Most notably: "It is a single-level cell (SLC) product with 34nm process geometry and Micron says its endurance is terrific: 3.5 petabytes can be written to the drive in total before it wears out, equivalent to writing 1.9TB/day continuously for five years." It was just a matter of time before the write cycle problem was dealt with.
  • Perhaps California has needs that are met better by Microsoft products. But I think this sums it up: "In the end, Google did not submit a final bid because it felt that it could not win in a contest where the state was crafting its requirements to fit what Microsoft would offer – and without a final bid from Google, the state has nothing to approve or reject." If they didn't submit a bid, even a flawed one, they were disqualified. End of story.
  • Don't tell me you didn't see this coming.

links for 2010-08-13 »

links for 2010-08-06 »