Virtualization Versions
Ryan over at vmhero.com is pondering what the numbers behind Virtualization 1.0, 2.0, etc. mean. I wish him luck with that. Personally, I’ve never heard any actual, real-life sysadmins refer to anything by those terms. I don’t have a Virtualization 2.0 environment, I have an environment that lets me get things done. And sometimes I upgrade it. Then I go home for the day. I do have one question, though. What version of virtualization will get us SkyNet? Actually, SkyNet uses a lot of physical hardware, so maybe it isn’t virtualized very well. I hope those creepy red eyes are low-voltage. In a weird twist of fate, I went to lunch before posting this and came back to Don MacAskill …