<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vendors Who Don&#8217;t Realize Virtualization Is Here To Stay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/</link>
	<description>Virtualization, System Administration, and Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 16:17:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75396</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75396</guid>
		<description>From what I understand the Oracle support issue may be resolved soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I understand the Oracle support issue may be resolved soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Update: Symantec and VMotion, Supported or not? » Yellow Bricks</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75358</link>
		<dc:creator>Update: Symantec and VMotion, Supported or not? » Yellow Bricks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75358</guid>
		<description>[...] last couple of days. Symantec wasn&#8217;t supporting VMotion for their anti-virus suite. (Mike D., Lone SysAdmin, VInternals)A little birdie just emailed me that the article has been updated: Is VMware VMotion [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last couple of days. Symantec wasn&#8217;t supporting VMotion for their anti-virus suite. (Mike D., Lone SysAdmin, VInternals)A little birdie just emailed me that the article has been updated: Is VMware VMotion [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Barking Seal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Like it or not, virtualization is in it for the long haul</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75355</link>
		<dc:creator>The Barking Seal &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Like it or not, virtualization is in it for the long haul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75355</guid>
		<description>[...] Lone Sysadmin, Bob Plankers, comments on the lack of vendor commitment to virtualization, and I fully concur. I see it especially with smaller, proprietary niche vendors. They&#8217;ll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lone Sysadmin, Bob Plankers, comments on the lack of vendor commitment to virtualization, and I fully concur. I see it especially with smaller, proprietary niche vendors. They&#8217;ll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75354</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75354</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more!  It&#039;s about time vendors get their heads straight and support VM&#039;s... which incidentally run FAR more reliably virtualized then they do on hardware!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more!  It&#8217;s about time vendors get their heads straight and support VM&#8217;s&#8230; which incidentally run FAR more reliably virtualized then they do on hardware!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig March</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75353</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75353</guid>
		<description>Hear hear!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://lonesysadmin.net/2008/11/18/vendors-who-dont-realize-virtualization-is-here-to-stay/comment-page-1/#comment-75352</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lonesysadmin.net/?p=1653#comment-75352</guid>
		<description>i totally agree with you on this!

you should maybe think of creating a virtual/virtuailzation pillory, where these companies get listed and everybody can see who thinks he doesn&#039;t need marketshare in virtualization area in his revenue.

Regards,
Ike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i totally agree with you on this!</p>
<p>you should maybe think of creating a virtual/virtuailzation pillory, where these companies get listed and everybody can see who thinks he doesn&#8217;t need marketshare in virtualization area in his revenue.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Ike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
